The Panerai Source Forums https://paneraisource.com/forum/ |
|
LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake https://paneraisource.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=936 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | polb [ Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:56 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake | ||||
Hello Can you please advise whether this is genuine or not. Better photos: http://imageshack.us/f/534/panerai42.jpg/ Paweł
|
Author: | Alex1974 [ Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake |
Dial : okay Hands : okay Case : okay Numercis : okay Any pictures from the back available ???? Have you ever seen the movement ? I mean you hold a 25.000 $ in your hand, so you should be sure what is inside Otherwise : Okay Cheers, Alex |
Author: | paneraisource [ Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake |
I would also be inclined to see the movement on this one if I were buying. |
Author: | polb [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:57 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake | ||||
This watch is not my, only my friend. The watch works. I have never seen his mechanism. And a few more pictures:
|
Author: | polb [ Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:00 am ] | ||||
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake | ||||
and a few more pictures
|
Author: | Alex1974 [ Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake |
The back looks fine as well but your "friend" should clean the watch a bit !!! @in addition : It looks like that the watch has been opened in the past. So once again : only the movement can show the true Cheers, Alex |
Author: | K.Panerai [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake |
see already know is fake |
Author: | mikewatch [ Tue Oct 14, 2014 5:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: LUMINOR PANERAI 5218-201/A - real or fake |
K.Panerai wrote: see already know is fake You seem to be good at identifying the garbage fakes k, but that is 201 is gen. You are incorrect on this one. Of course op it goes without saying to get the provenance of the piece and some due diligence but it is the real thing. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |