I prefer the 1950 case, like from the PAM 212
Cheers,
Alex
| The Panerai Source Forums https://paneraisource.com/forum/ |
|
| Historic vs 1950 https://paneraisource.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1116 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | rebel_1 [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Historic vs 1950 |
Since I don't know how to create a real poll, the question is, which do you prefer? Historic or 1950 case. I personally prefer the Historic when it comes to comfort. R/ |
|
| Author: | Alex1974 [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
I prefer the 1950 case, like from the PAM 212 Cheers, Alex |
|
| Author: | simon [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
It's got to be the 1950 case for me even though my shirt cuff barely fits over it! 
|
|
| Author: | enezdez [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
I have been curious for sometime, can someone please tell me the difference between the "Historic" & the "1950"? Thanks, Enezdez |
|
| Author: | rebel_1 [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
Historic case is slimer and a little less boxy. It also is curved a little on the back side. Also has screw in strap bars. 1950 case is thicker. More boxy. Some call it a pillow cushion shape. The back is much thicker. The strap bars / pins have a unique push pin type of installation. Overall, I prefer the "wear" of the historic while I definitely like the quick strap change function with the push pin. R/ |
|
| Author: | enezdez [ Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
rebel_1 wrote: Historic case is slimer and a little less boxy. It also is curved a little on the back side. Also has screw in strap bars. 1950 case is thicker. More boxy. Some call it a pillow cushion shape. The back is much thicker. The strap bars / pins have a unique push pin type of installation. Overall, I prefer the "wear" of the historic while I definitely like the quick strap change function with the push pin. R/ Thanks Enezdez |
|
| Author: | paneraisource [ Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
I wrote a little article on the cases, though it needs to be updated now, especially with the new Radiomir case. http://www.paneraisource.com/articles_caseshape.shtml |
|
| Author: | enezdez [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
paneraisource wrote: I wrote a little article on the cases, though it needs to be updated now, especially with the new Radiomir case. http://www.paneraisource.com/articles_caseshape.shtml Thanks! It appears to me the 1950 is a hybrid between the Historical Luminor and the Historical Radiomir or am I just wrong? Enezdez |
|
| Author: | fullcourt [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Historic vs 1950 |
enezdez wrote: paneraisource wrote: I wrote a little article on the cases, though it needs to be updated now, especially with the new Radiomir case. http://www.paneraisource.com/articles_caseshape.shtml Thanks! It appears to me the 1950 is a hybrid between the Historical Luminor and the Historical Radiomir or am I just wrong? Enezdez not quite...the rad is a bit different than the lum. rad is thinner for sure. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|