sportback wrote:
The pic of the 321 is correctly labelled - this model has the 'reserve de marche' indicator which the 329 doesn't, besides which the 329 has a steel bracelet.
I stand suitably corrected on that one! (I only suggested it as your description of the 329 just said "44mm Steel Luminor 1950 3 days GMT Power Reserve with P.9002 calibre", so as that pic (which is the 321) was the only in-house GMT with a power reserve, I assumed a typo! My apologies, Sporty
).
sportback wrote:
As to PVD/Ceramic, if you're prepared to pay the price of a ceramic Panerai, so be it - PVD can indeed be scratched, ceramic can be shattered...
Very true, but if I was in the market for a black watch, and the choice was a PVD (even if it's DLC) coated piece, or ceramic that I couldn't afford, I just wouldn't have a black watch! Just a personal opinion obviously.........
The problem with ceramic is indeed its brittleness, but a number of manufacturers have added compounds to the ZO to improve it dramatically. For example, IWC's Doppel Chrono Top Gun is supposedly extremely tough. Just as an aside I came across one ZO ceramic manufacturer that gives a demo of their ceramic by hammering a nail into a piece of wood with a ZO ceramic hammer!