|
Panerai Aficionado |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:29 pm Posts: 149 Location: sunny socal, USA
|
i had a 233 and unlike most i didn't care much for the 1950's casing and domed crystal. made the dial looks smaller/compact and distorted the hour numbers...felt weird to me.
i like the 312 with the flatter crystal, it might be too thick tho? not sure i'd want an automatic panerai either but that might be a bonus to some with the inhouse movement. having said all that the 312 certainly have a more updated modern design feel to it imo with the date/auto/inhouse mvmt etc. if ur wrist can handle the extra thickness i'd say it's worth it.
|
|