As I've stated before, the 341 is a bit of a strange beast and I question it's real 'usefulness', but the fact that Panerai
have made it encourages me as it shows they're willing to go out on a limb with the occasional unusual piece. What makes me laugh are the comments regarding the use of the P.2002 movement in it - what on earth is wrong with that? Despite all my moaning (Hmm David?) I think it's a fantastic idea to mix the old and the new - what better way than to reproduce a 1956 case with a 2002 movement - brilliant, and I hope we see more 'one offs' like this. A marvellous way of continuing the history of the marque.
I'm keen to know just how much sway the 'paneristi' community have with Panerai, in particular the criticisms of the auto-only P.900x series. If people only 'feel' the history by winding up their watches every morning, far be it from me to stop them, but I'm a particularly lazy person, and the fact that the watch does it all by itself is a bonus in my eyes
so the new in-house movements are definately a move in the right direction.
Personally I am attracted to the 'peculiar' models - the 270 doesn't need a 10 day power reserve AND an automatic movement - that's why I love it. In the same way, the 28 with the Soprod movement, is the only current model with a sweep seconds hand - magic! I've just picked up a 164, again an oddity as it's the only black faced dial model with
all the numbers - well actually, no 3 or 9, but even so, you get my drift...
Now if only they had made it without the cyclops....
Interestingly, I've also seen a number of comments regarding the use of the 'sandwich' dial on the new 30x series - it would seem that there are people who prefer the painted version, which seems a little inconsistent as it seems to me that these are the very same people crying out for historical accuracy...